Cca background tool

CCA's greatest strength may also be its greatest weakness—it works outside the web browser. But CCA is an excellent tool evaluating text in images, and it really shines when evaluating electronic documents, such as Word and PDF files.

An earlier version, called "CCA Classic", is also available for download. The new version is more refined and useful overall, but the earlier version has a couple notable advantages:.

The Accessibility Checker in Microsoft Office and can identify low-contrast text within its built-in accessibility checker. It evaluates both text and background color and automatically applies the lower contrast ratio to large text.

Text with low contrast is identified as " Hard-to-read text contrast ". There is no one "best" tool for testing contrast. The tools you use will depend on the content being evaluated and on personal preferences.

Likewise, there is no single testing process that is best for all content. But most contrast evaluations will include at least these three "steps" although the order may vary :.

Evaluating contrast and color use can take considerable time and effort, but this process will become more natural with time. Your preferred tools and methods will likely change with experience and may grow beyond what is outlined in this article, but applying the principles and steps in this article will provide a solid foundation of what is required in WCAG 2 and how to test for it.

Introduction This article outlines tools and techniques that can be used to evaluate contrast and color use. WebAIM Contrast Checker WebAIM offers an online contrast checker that will present the contrast difference between two colors, and will help you identify a color that meets the desired level of contrast. WebAIM Link Contrast Checker If a link is only identified by a color difference typically meaning that it is not underlined , WCAG requires a contrast ratio between the link text and surrounding body text.

Select the Contrast button on the left-hand sidebar of the screen. An icon appears next to each instance of low-contrast text detected by WAVE. Click on an icon in the sidebar or within the page to see the contrast ratio for this text in the sidebar. Journal of Public Health Medicine , 26 4 The IRC has scales for intercultural sensitivity, intercultural communication, intercultural relationship building, conflict management, leadership and tolerance for ambiguity.

The instrument has been developed and tested over a period of more than three years. Van der Zee and Brinkmann, The components of this instrument are substantial knowledge, perceptual understanding and intercultural communication.

Citation: Narayan, M. Cultural assessment and care planning. Home HealthCare Nurse , 21 9 , — It measures tolerance for ambiguity, behavioural flexibility, communicative awareness, knowledge discovery, respect for otherness and empathy. INCA, The authors developed survey items to measure three content areas of the hidden curriculum with respect to patient-centered care. The survey was distributed to third- and fourth-year students at ten medical schools in the United States.

Using factor analysis, the authors selected items for the final version of the C3 Instrument. Citation: Haidet, P. Academic Medicine , 80 1 , Citation: Bacon, J. Becker, Cookston, J. Journal of Nursing Education , 42, The Cronbach alpha for the 3 factors ranged from. More positive scores higher EFURMS Scores were associated with older faculty who had been teaching longer and had more experience teaching underrepresented minority students.

Citation: Moreau, P. Dissertation: University of Massachusetts Medical School. Graduate School of Nursing Dissertations. Possible scores range from , with higher score indicating that students perceived greater integration of cultural competence in their nursing program.

Citation: Godfrey, S. Current Psychology , 19, Citation: Jo, M. Marketing Letters , 8, This monograph compares organizational assessment instruments through the following questions: For what type of organization was the instrument developed? How were the instruments developed? How do the authors define cultural competence? What domains do the authors use as categories of analysis?

Duanying Cai of Chiang Mai University. The tool consists of 29 items including five dimensions: cultural awareness, cultural respect, cultural knowledge, cultural understanding and cultural skills.

The validity was also tested by the developer. Completion time for this questionnaire was approximately 10 min. Citation: Cai, D. Developing a cultural competence inventory for nurses in China. International Nursing Review. The total score ranges from zero to Higher total NCCS scores indicate a higher level of cultural competence. Citation: Perng, S. Construct validation of the nurse cultural competence scale: a hierarchy of abilities.

J Clin Nurs , 21 11—12 ,— The nurses self-report their perceived level as novice, advanced beginner, competent, or proficient to expert by marking what they believed best described their level of cultural competence in nursing care. This method of using a rating based on the concepts of novice to expert has been successfully used by other researchers.

With permission from the authors, 44 statements were extracted and modified from the two tools in order to support development of the survey.

The survey is comprised of seven sections that addressed the following: cross-cultural interactions, cultural awareness of self, seeking and sharing knowledge, global and domestic awareness, cross-cultural communication, international and multicultural experiences, and clinical perspectives.

The survey was structured on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree 1 , disagree 2 , neutral 3 , agree 4 , and strongly agree 5. In order to measure frequency of behaviors, a 5-point Likert scale ranged from never 1 , sometimes 2 , neutral 3 , usually 4 , and often 5.

The overall reliability level of the combined subscales was. J Clin Nurs , Earle Waugh and Dr. Jean Triscott to help health care professionals evaluate their own cultural knowledge, awareness, sensitivity, behaviors, and cultural confidence. Citation: Waugh, EH. Szafran O. Canada: Brush Education, Inc.

This measure contains nine elements that assess the person's daily life, followed by a follow-up question about what the person believes was the reason for that daily discrimination.

This measure also presents a short version of five elements. It takes five to ten minutes to administer. Williams and colleagues have also developed other assessment tools measuring discrimination and is available at Everyday Discrimination Scale David R. Williams harvard. Citation: Williams, D. Journal of Health Psychology, 2 3 , Citation: Echeverri, M. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education , 74 Items include questions regarding training, preparedness in cross-cultural experiences, skillfulness, resources, specialty preparedness and demographics.

JAMA, 9 , There are 16 items in this self-assessment tool: knowledge 6 items , skills 6 items , and attitude 4 items. Citation: Crandall, S. Acad Med , Cultural assessment tools were only included if the reliability and validity had been evaluated and reported in a peer review publication. The guidebook and tool also have applicability for traditional mental health and rehabilitation programs.

The project involved the following components: 1 comprehensive review of existing tools for assessing cultural competency in human services organizations; 2 web-based survey of peer-run programs to determine their current needs and practices in delivering culturally competent services and supports; 3 Focus groups and interviews with individuals from diverse backgrounds who attend or staff peer-run organization; 4 Creation of an organizational assessment and accompanying guide for administering the assessment; 5 Formation of a multi-stakeholder, external expert review team to provide feedback on the assessment and administration guide; and 5 Pilot testing the assessment at 9 peer-run organizations to determine the usability of the cultural competency assessment.

It relies upon third-party consumer assessment of the cultural competency of mental health providers. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the correlations between each of the 8 subscales as well as by factor analysis. Citation: Cornelius, L. Research on Social Work Practice , 14, The search for assessment tools meeting criteria yielded 45 instruments. A final selection of 17 organizational assessment instruments was examined in this report.

Citation: Harper, M. Their model of intercultural communication competence involves three dimensions: intercultural awareness, intercultural sensitivity, and intercultural adroitness.

This item scale includes the fallowing 5 emotional sub-scales for intercultural sensitivity: 1 interaction engagement; 2 respect for cultural difference; 3 interaction confidence; 4 interaction enjoyment; and 5 interaction attentiveness. Citation: Chen, C. Burleson Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Guide can serve as a tool for training new clinicians and assisting experienced clinicians and provides specific templates and guidance on how to assess acculturation and related stress factors for both adults and adolescent clients.

It also discusses how this level of assessment can be part of the cultural formulation and treatment planning process. A Guide for conducting clinical assessment of Hispanic and Latino Clients. This model describes cultural competency in terms of four dimensions: attitude, practice, policy, and structure.

This instrument is intended to help service providers and staff at child and family serving agencies to assess their cross-cultural strengths and weaknesses in order to design specific training activities or interventions that promote greater competence across cultures.

Papadopoulos, R. Contemporary Nurse , 28 2 , Advances in Contemporary Transcultural Nursing 2nd edition.

This instrument contains 37 items and uses a likert-type 6-point scale of agree-disagree format. The internal consistent is reported at. Five factors resulted from the analysis. Microskills items refer to course content related to basic counseling and communication skills training. Process items describe an integration of counselor responses when working with a client. The sum of the Difficult Client Behaviors items indicates high self efficacy for dealing with silent or unmotivated clients.

Cultural Competence items refer to behaving competently with clients of different ethnic or cultural groups. Citation: Larson, L.

Development and validation of the Counseling Self-Estimate. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 39 1 , It contains an excellent compilation of strategies to enhance cultural competence in mental health agencies. Pages of this document provides readers with an annotated bibliography of several organizational cultural assessment tools.

In addition, pages consists of an annotated bibliography of several individual cultural assessment tools. It provides concrete examples of the kinds of beliefs, attitudes, values, and practices that foster military cultural competence at the individual or practitioner level. Located HERE. The C-CAT Tool Kit was developed in conjunction with mental health consumers, family members, service planners and providers, and the Outcomes Management Group, a Columbus-based management consulting firm.

Monica Roizner, is a guide to planning and implementing cultural competence assessments, with brief reviews of 14 assessment tools, resources for post-assessment cultural competence, and contact information. It is useful to agency and program administrators, providers, and human resource personnel, cultural competence trainers, and family members.

The survey includes 6 questions related to Latino knowledge, 19 questions related to Cultural competence, and 15 questions related to Comfort with Latino patients. Responses to the questions were formatted in such a way that higher scores 1: lowest, 5: highest indicate better knowledge, more positive attitudes, or higher comfort with Latinos.

All measurement items were self-rating. It was found that 3 composite measures were important to the study. The mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum scores for the three composite multi-item measures of Latino knowledge, Cultural competence, and Comfort with Latino patients were calculated.

Latino knowledge had 6 items with a five-point Likert Scale for a range of 6 to 30 total points possible , and the Cronbach's alpha was 0. The mean score of Latino knowledge was Cultural competence had 19 five-point items for a range of 19 to 95 total points possible , and its Cronbach's alpha was 0. The mean score was Lastly, Comfort with Latino patients had 15 five-point items for a range of 15 to 75 total points possible with the Cronbach's alpha of 0.

Citation: Sherrill, W. Assessing medical student cultural competence: What really matters. Int J Med Educ. Citation: Gamst, G. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development , 37 3 , This project aims to assist clinicians in assessing the mental health of people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Contact: Valza. Thomas health. Following a 2-year, community-driven instrument development process, this consumer assessment tool was administered to African American, Latino, and Vietnamese American mental health consumers across the state of Maryland.

Research on the tool is published in the following citation: Cornelius, L. The validity and reliability testing of a consumer-based cultural competency inventory.

Research on Social Work Practice , 14 3 The intent is to evaluate how often one feels this way when working with ethnic minority clients. Each statement is answered by circling one number ranging from 5 always to 4 frequently , 3 occasionally , 2 seldom , and 1 never.

Citation: Ho, M. Athey and Moody-Williams. This guide includes two sections and six appendices. Section One explores the nature of culture and disaster and discusses cultural competence in the context of disaster mental health services. Section One also presents the Cultural Competence Continuum and a list of questions to address in a disaster mental health plan.

Section Two sets forth nine guiding principles for culturally competent disaster mental health services and related recommendations for developing these services. The appendices provide an annotated bibliography of cultural competence resources and tools as well as a Cultural Competence Checklist for Disaster Crisis Counseling Programs.

The assessment consists of questions appropriate for state mental health agencies in ten areas of cultural competency. The developers of the instrument suggest that it is best used for providing feedback during training — by faculty, peers, and clients — during simulated or actual counseling sessions, and as a self-assessment tool.

This instrument has been cited in more than 75 scientific articles. Citation: LaFromboise, T. Development and factor structure of the Cross-cultural Counseling Inventory — Revised. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 22 5 : WICS presents 16 situations that study abroad students are likely to encounter when engaging in activities of daily living e. Other forms of psychometric measures are provided in the following citation: Stemlee, S.

The instrument was developed for use by counselors and has been tested on both professional and trainee populations. Revision of the Multicultural Counseling Awareness Scale. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development , Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development , Statistical analysis identified four core domains assessed by the instrument: as 1 the ability to tune into psycho-social, medical, and spiritual needs; 2 the accessibility of services and the willingness to negotiate on priorities for care; 3 efforts to reach out to racially diverse communities; and 4 the willingness to listen to and respect people in recovery from various cultures.

Citation: T. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal , 28 3 : Additionally, the purpose of this tool is to help counselors recognize that culture is not external to themselves, and helps to combat cultural group stereotyping p.

Citation: Ramsey, M. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling , 77 4 , The Performance Measures in the Tool were designed to have three functions: to measure the extent to which services can achieve the Cultural Competency Standards; to guide services in how to strive for best practice and quality-assured service provisions to CALD communities; and to assist services in implementing cultural competency initiatives at all levels. The MCI is based on a conceptual framework from Sue et al.

Citation: Sodowsky, G. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 41, As the Certified CCA gains experience and efficiency, the employer or sector determines the desired level of proficiency within the employment setting.

The framework very simply organizes the competencies needed by CCAs and gives employers an easy document to reference The framework, being an industry competency model, is focused on entry-level practice 3 for CCAs entering the workforce in a variety of settings and forms the base of the pyramid and includes two competencies, Accountability and Integrity. These competencies are pivotal to the CCAs ability to demonstrate the core competencies.

The individual competencies are linked to behaviours. The behaviours provide an indication of how the competency can be applied to meet the unique care needs of the individual.